DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTIVE MEDIA AS FAMILY ASSISTANCE TO PREGNANT WOMEN IN IMPROVING QUALITY OF LIFE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58185/jkr.v14i2.147Keywords:
Quality of Life, Interactive Media, Pregnant WomenAbstract
Background: Pregnancy is a physiological or natural condition that can occur physical and emotional changes. One way to improve the quality of life (QOL) is with family assistance. Interactive learning media is a learning method based on information and communication technology.
Objective:To analyze the quality of life of pregnant women who are given interactive media as family assistance.
Method: Quasi Experimental research design with Non-equivalent pre-test and post-test control group design. The quality of life instrument used in this study uses WHOQOL-Bref which consists of 26 questions with a Likert scale. Samples were taken by purposive sampling as many as 108 pregnant women who were divided into 2 intervention and control groups spread across at works area of Sleman Primary Health Centre.
Results: The average increase in QOL for pregnant women in the intervention group was 1.74 and in the control group the average increase in QOL for pregnant women was 0.65. Mann-Whitney statistical test 0.025 (<0.05) which means there is a difference in the increase in QOL of pregnant women in the group of mothers who were given interactive media in the form of learning videos and those who were not given videos.
Conclusion: Theres a significant difference in increasing the Quality of Life for pregnant women before and after providing interactive media in the form of learning videos. Health workers are advised to make interactive media as a form of promotive and preventive efforts for maternal and child health services.
Keywords: Quality of Life, Interactive Media, Pregnant Women
References
WHO. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2020: estimates. WHO, Geneva. 2021. 12 p.
Badan Pusat Statistik. Profil Kesehatan Ibu dan Anak 2022. [cited 2024 Jan 1]; Available from: https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2022/12/23/54f24c0520b257b3def481be/profil-kesehatan-ibu-dan-anak-2022.html
Bourgoin E, Callahan S, Séjourné N, Denis A. Image du corps et grossesse : Vécu subjectif de 12 femmes selon une approche mixte et exploratoire. Psychologie Francaise. 2012;57(3):205–13.
Vachkova E, Jezek S, Mares J, Moravcova M. The evaluation of the psychometric properties of a specific quality of life questionnaire for physiological pregnancy [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://www.hqlo.com/content/11/1/214
Tang X, Lu Z, Hu D, Zhong X. Influencing factors for prenatal Stress, anxiety and depression in early pregnancy among women in Chongqing, China. J Affect Disord. 2019 Jun 15;253:292–302.
World Health Organization. Definition of skilled health personnel providing [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2024 Jan 1]. Available from: https://www.icn.ch/sites/default/files/inline-files/WHO-RHR-18.14-eng.pdf
Mogos MF, August EM, Salinas-Miranda AA, Sultan DH, Salihu HM. A Systematic Review of Quality of Life Measures in Pregnant and Postpartum Mothers. Vol. 8, Applied Research in Quality of Life. 2013. p. 219–50.
Redinger S, Norris SA, Pearson RM, Richter L, Rochat T. First trimester antenatal depression and anxiety: Prevalence and associated factors in an urban population in Soweto, South Africa. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2018 Feb 1;9(1):30–40.
Permenkes. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia 2016. 2016.
O’Sullivan TA, Cooke J, McCafferty C, Giglia R. Online video instruction
on hand expression of colostrum in pregnancy is an effective educational tool. Nutrients. 2019 Apr 1;11(4).
Mubin MN. Perancangan Media Pembelajaran Interakif Sistem Skeletal Pada Mata Kuliah Dasar Keperawatan I. Vol. 0, Jurnal Sistem Skeletal.
Dinkes DIY. Profil Kesehatan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. 2021;1–66.
Brekke M, Berg RC, Amro A, Glavin K, Haugland T. Quality of Life instruments and their psychometric properties for use in parents during pregnancy and the postpartum period: a systematic scoping review. Vol. 20, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. BioMed Central Ltd; 2022.
Peter M. Fayers DM. Quality of Life : The Assesment, Analysis, and Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 3rd Editions. 2016. 1–648 p.
Freer J, Orr J, Walton R, Storr HL, Dunkel L, Prendergast AJ. Does stunting still matter in high-income countries? Vol. 50, Annals of Human Biology. Taylor and Francis Ltd.; 2023. p. 267–73.
Fauzy R, Fourianalisyawati E. Hubungan antara Depresi dengan Kualitas Hidup pada Ibu Hamil Berisiko Tinggi The Relationship Of Depression With Quality Of Life In Pregnant Women At High Risk. Vol. 4, Jurnal Psikogenesis. 2016.
Alnuaimi K, Alshraifeen A, Aljaraedah H. Factors influencing quality of life among syrian refugees pregnant women in Jordan: A cross-sectional study. Heliyon. 2022 Sep 1;8(9).
Lagadec N, Steinecker M, Kapassi A, Magnier AM, Chastang J, Robert S, et al. Factors influencing the quality of life of pregnant women: A systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Nov 23;18(1).
Zhan Z, Su ZW, Chang HL. Education and Quality of Life: Does the Internet Matter in China? Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 18;10.
Cooke A, Mills TA, Lavender T. Advanced maternal age: Delayed childbearing is rarely a conscious choice. A qualitative study of women’s views and experiences. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Jan;49(1):30–9.
Fontenele de Oliveira M, Parker L, Ahn H, Lívia Oliveira Catunda H, Braga Rodrigues Bernardo E, Fontenele de Oliveira M, et al. Maternal Predictors for Quality of Life during the Postpartum in Brazilian Mothers. Health N Hav [Internet]. 2015;7(7):371–80. Available from: http://www.scirp.org/journal/health%5Cnhttp://dx.doi.org/10.4236/health.2015.73042%5Cnhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Goodyear VA, Boardley I, Chiou SY, Fenton SAM, Makopoulou K, Stathi A, et al. Social media use informing behaviours related to physical activity, diet and quality of life during COVID-19: a mixed methods study. BMC Public Health. 2021 Dec 1;21(1).
Özden F, Sarı Z, Karaman ÖN, Aydoğmuş H. The effect of video exercise-based telerehabilitation on clinical outcomes, expectation, satisfaction, and motivation in patients with chronic low back pain. Ir J Med Sci. 2022 Jun 1;191(3):1229–39.
Özden F, Sarı Z, Karaman ÖN, Aydoğmuş H. The effect of video exercise-based telerehabilitation on clinical outcomes, expectation, satisfaction, and motivation in patients with chronic low back pain. Ir J Med Sci. 2022 Jun;191(3):1229–39.
Gao Z, Ryu S, Zhou W, Adams K, Hassan M, Zhang R, et al. Effects of personalized exercise prescriptions and social media delivered through mobile health on cancer survivors’ physical activity and quality of life. J Sport Health Sci. 2023 Nov 1;12(6):705–14.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 JURNAL KESEHATAN REPRODUKSI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
